Kongresowy Turniej Indywidualny 126: M Bublewicz | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | A Piwakowski-W Mróz,*-M Hutyra | 1 | WE | 1 | S | K | -2 | +100 | 51.47% | 51.47% | ||
A Piwakowski-*,M Hutyra-W Mróz | 2 | NS | 4 | E | J | +1 | -450 | 19.12% | 35.29% | |||
A Piwakowski-M Hutyra,W Mróz-* | 3 | WE | 3 | E | 7 | +3 | +170 | 30.88% | 33.82% | |||
2 | V Valchev-A Nekhoroshev,*-S Lejk | 7 | WE | 3 | N | 4 | +1 | -170 | 26.47% | 31.99% | ||
V Valchev-*,S Lejk-A Nekhoroshev | 8 | NS | 3 | S | 5 | -2 | -100 | 92.65% | 44.12% | |||
V Valchev-S Lejk,A Nekhoroshev-* | 9 | WE | 3 | E | 5 | = | +600 | 70.59% | 48.53% | |||
3 | A Jaskulecka-A Czech,*-P Chindelewicz | 13 | WE | 2 | W | 6 | +2 | +170 | 57.35% | 49.79% | ||
A Jaskulecka-*,P Chindelewicz-A Czech | 14 | NS | 4 | N | A | -1 | -50 | 57.35% | 50.74% | |||
A Jaskulecka-P Chindelewicz,A Czech-* | 15 | WE | 2 | S | 3 | = | -90 | 34.87% | 48.97% | |||
4 | R Nowicki-A Szepczyński,*-A Pyclik-Chojenka | 4 | WE | 4 | S | 9 | -1 | +100 | 85.29% | 52.60% | ||
R Nowicki-*,A Pyclik-Chojenka-A Szepczyński | 5 | NS | 4 | E | 7 | = | -420 | 76.47% | 54.77% | |||
R Nowicki-A Pyclik-Chojenka,A Szepczyński-* | 6 | WE | 3 | S | Q | -1 | +50 | 76.47% | 56.58% | |||
5 | P Błaszczyk-B Buczkowska-Linke,*-L Jędryszek | 10 | WE | 6 | E | 2 | = | +1440 | 79.41% | 58.34% | ||
P Błaszczyk-*,L Jędryszek-B Buczkowska-Linke | 11 | NS | 3 | N | 5 | -1 | -50 | 16.18% | 55.33% | |||
P Błaszczyk-L Jędryszek,B Buczkowska-Linke-* | 12 | WE | 4× | W | J | -3 | -500 | 70.59% | 56.34% | |||
6 | *-I Jagielski,P Peradziryi-T Kaczanowski | 16 | NS | 4 | E | 7 | +1 | -650 | 30.88% | 54.75% | ||
*-P Peradziryi,T Kaczanowski-I Jagielski | 17 | NS | 2 | E | 5 | -2 | +100 | 100.00% | 57.41% | |||
*-T Kaczanowski,I Jagielski-P Peradziryi | 18 | NS | 3 | E | K | -1 | +50 | 41.18% | 56.51% | |||
7 | *-K Sikorski,J Wiśniewska-Z Pinkiewicz | 19 | NS | 4 | E | 2 | +1 | -650 | 73.53% | 57.41% | ||
*-J Wiśniewska,Z Pinkiewicz-K Sikorski | 20 | NS | 4 | W | K | +2 | -680 | 48.53% | 56.96% | |||
*-Z Pinkiewicz,K Sikorski-J Wiśniewska | 21 | NS | 3 | E | 7 | -3 | +150 | 72.06% | 57.68% | |||
8 | *-G Superson,B Żelazowski-W Dygas | 22 | NS | 4 | W | K | -1 | +100 | 26.47% | 56.26% | ||
*-B Żelazowski,W Dygas-G Superson | 23 | NS | 1 | S | 6 | -1 | -100 | 67.65% | 56.76% | |||
*-W Dygas,G Superson-B Żelazowski | 24 | NS | 2 | N | 9 | = | +110 | 73.53% | 57.46% | |||
9 | *-R Jarmużewski,T Wiśniewski-A Kowalski | 25 | NS | 4× | S | 8 | -1 | -100 | 45.59% | 56.98% | ||
*-T Wiśniewski,A Kowalski-R Jarmużewski | 26 | NS | 3 | S | K | +2 | +150 | 7.35% | 55.07% | |||
*-A Kowalski,R Jarmużewski-T Wiśniewski | 27 | NS | 3 | S | 5 | +2 | +460 | 63.24% | 55.38% | |||
10 | *-T Garbacik,M Giełczyński-V Kanstantsinau | 28 | NS | 6× | S | 4 | -1 | -200 | 8.82% | 53.71% | ||
*-M Giełczyński,V Kanstantsinau-T Garbacik | 29 | NS | 5 | W | A | = | -650 | 19.12% | 52.52% | |||
*-V Kanstantsinau,T Garbacik-M Giełczyński | 30 | NS | 4 | N | 4 | -1 | -50 | 79.41% | 53.42% | |||
SUMA: | 53.42% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 53.42% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 38 |
Pary.4.1.0.25 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2018-08-07 o 14:19:12