Kongresowy Turniej Indywidualny 131: P Peradziryi | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | M Pietrzak-Y Hardzei,*-A Osiński | 1 | WE | 1 | S | Q | -3 | +150 | 91.18% | 91.18% | ||
M Pietrzak-*,A Osiński-Y Hardzei | 2 | NS | 4 | E | J | +1 | -450 | 19.12% | 55.15% | |||
M Pietrzak-A Osiński,Y Hardzei-* | 3 | WE | 5 | E | 9 | +1 | +620 | 75.00% | 61.76% | |||
2 | M Jaworski-S Wiśniewski,*-P Szczygieł | 7 | WE | 4 | N | 4 | = | -620 | 10.29% | 48.90% | ||
M Jaworski-*,P Szczygieł-S Wiśniewski | 8 | NS | 4 | W | K | +1 | -450 | 23.53% | 43.82% | |||
M Jaworski-P Szczygieł,S Wiśniewski-* | 9 | WE | 3 | E | 5 | = | +600 | 70.59% | 48.28% | |||
3 | M Boczar-P Ciszak,*-M Witek | 13 | WE | 4 | W | 6 | -1 | -100 | 11.76% | 43.07% | ||
M Boczar-*,M Witek-P Ciszak | 14 | NS | 4 | E | 4 | -1 | +50 | 69.12% | 46.32% | |||
M Boczar-M Witek,P Ciszak-* | 15 | WE | 2 | S | 7 | = | -90 | 34.87% | 45.05% | |||
4 | K Dowolski-L Łuniewski,*-W Starkowski | 4 | WE | 3 | S | Q | +1 | -630 | 20.59% | 42.60% | ||
K Dowolski-*,W Starkowski-L Łuniewski | 5 | NS | 4 | E | 4 | -1 | +50 | 95.59% | 47.42% | |||
K Dowolski-W Starkowski,L Łuniewski-* | 6 | WE | 6 | S | Q | -1 | +50 | 76.47% | 49.84% | |||
5 | J Rozenberg-M Bednarczyk,*-A Pawlak | 10 | WE | 6 | W | 10 | +1 | +1460 | 91.18% | 53.02% | ||
J Rozenberg-*,A Pawlak-M Bednarczyk | 11 | NS | 2× | W | 10 | -2 | +300 | 72.06% | 54.38% | |||
J Rozenberg-A Pawlak,M Bednarczyk-* | 12 | WE | 5 | N | K | = | -600 | 64.71% | 55.07% | |||
6 | M Bublewicz-I Jagielski,*-T Kaczanowski | 16 | WE | 4 | E | 7 | +1 | +650 | 69.12% | 55.95% | ||
M Bublewicz-*,T Kaczanowski-I Jagielski | 17 | NS | 2 | E | 5 | -2 | +100 | 100.00% | 58.54% | |||
M Bublewicz-T Kaczanowski,I Jagielski-* | 18 | WE | 3 | E | K | -1 | -50 | 58.82% | 58.55% | |||
7 | P Kazub-R Jarmużewski,*-V Kanstantsinau | 22 | WE | 3× | S | Q | -1 | +100 | 80.88% | 59.73% | ||
P Kazub-*,V Kanstantsinau-R Jarmużewski | 23 | NS | 2 | W | 3 | -1 | +100 | 92.65% | 61.38% | |||
P Kazub-V Kanstantsinau,R Jarmużewski-* | 24 | WE | 2 | S | 10 | -1 | +50 | 60.29% | 61.32% | |||
8 | J Grewling-K Sikorski,*-A Kowalski | 28 | WE | 3 | N | 3 | +1 | -630 | 32.35% | 60.01% | ||
J Grewling-*,A Kowalski-K Sikorski | 29 | NS | 2 | E | 5 | +3 | -200 | 54.41% | 59.76% | |||
J Grewling-A Kowalski,K Sikorski-* | 30 | WE | 2 | E | K | = | +110 | 55.88% | 59.60% | |||
9 | A Kończak-T Garbacik,*-W Dygas | 19 | WE | 4 | E | 2 | +2 | +680 | 61.76% | 59.69% | ||
A Kończak-*,W Dygas-T Garbacik | 20 | NS | 5 | W | K | +1 | -680 | 48.53% | 59.26% | |||
A Kończak-W Dygas,T Garbacik-* | 21 | WE | 2 | E | 7 | -2 | -100 | 51.47% | 58.97% | |||
10 | M Kliś-G Superson,*-Z Pinkiewicz | 25 | WE | 4× | E | K | -1 | -200 | 22.06% | 57.65% | ||
M Kliś-*,Z Pinkiewicz-G Superson | 26 | NS | 5 | N | A | = | +600 | 42.65% | 57.14% | |||
M Kliś-Z Pinkiewicz,G Superson-* | 27 | WE | 3 | S | 5 | +2 | -460 | 36.76% | 56.46% | |||
SUMA: | 56.46% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 56.46% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 18 |
Pary.4.1.0.25 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2018-08-07 o 14:19:12