Kongresowy Turniej Indywidualny 134: B Żelazowski | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | K Dowolski-P Ciszak,*-P Szczygieł | 10 | WE | 4 | W | 8 | +2 | +680 | 10.29% | 10.29% | ||
K Dowolski-*,P Szczygieł-P Ciszak | 11 | NS | 3 | S | 10 | = | +400 | 83.82% | 47.06% | |||
K Dowolski-P Szczygieł,P Ciszak-* | 12 | WE | 6 | S | 10 | +1 | -1460 | 0.00% | 31.37% | |||
2 | J Rozenberg-L Łuniewski,*-M Witek | 1 | WE | 1 | S | Q | -2 | +100 | 51.47% | 36.40% | ||
J Rozenberg-*,M Witek-L Łuniewski | 2 | NS | 4 | E | 3 | +1 | -450 | 19.12% | 32.94% | |||
J Rozenberg-M Witek,L Łuniewski-* | 3 | WE | 4 | E | 10 | +2 | +170 | 30.88% | 32.60% | |||
3 | M Pietrzak-M Bednarczyk,*-W Starkowski | 7 | WE | 4 | N | 4 | -1 | +100 | 61.76% | 36.76% | ||
M Pietrzak-*,W Starkowski-M Bednarczyk | 8 | NS | 3 | W | A | +2 | -200 | 57.35% | 39.34% | |||
M Pietrzak-W Starkowski,M Bednarczyk-* | 9 | WE | 4× | S | 4 | -5 | +1100 | 100.00% | 46.08% | |||
4 | M Jaworski-Y Hardzei,*-A Pawlak | 13 | WE | 4× | S | K | -7 | +2000 | 100.00% | 51.47% | ||
M Jaworski-*,A Pawlak-Y Hardzei | 14 | NS | 3 | N | J | = | +110 | 92.65% | 55.21% | |||
M Jaworski-A Pawlak,Y Hardzei-* | 15 | WE | 2 | S | J | = | -90 | 34.87% | 53.52% | |||
5 | M Boczar-S Wiśniewski,*-A Osiński | 4 | WE | 3 | S | 10 | -1 | +100 | 85.29% | 55.96% | ||
M Boczar-*,A Osiński-S Wiśniewski | 5 | NS | 3 | E | 6 | -2 | +100 | 100.00% | 59.11% | |||
M Boczar-A Osiński,S Wiśniewski-* | 6 | WE | 3 | S | Q | -1 | +50 | 76.47% | 60.27% | |||
6 | A Kończak-K Sikorski,*-V Kanstantsinau | 25 | WE | 4× | N | A | -2 | +300 | 77.94% | 61.37% | ||
A Kończak-*,V Kanstantsinau-K Sikorski | 26 | NS | 3 | S | 4 | +3 | +170 | 22.06% | 59.06% | |||
A Kończak-V Kanstantsinau,K Sikorski-* | 27 | WE | 4 | S | 5 | +1 | -450 | 73.53% | 59.86% | |||
7 | M Kliś-T Garbacik,*-A Kowalski | 16 | WE | 3 | W | A | +1 | +630 | 26.47% | 58.10% | ||
M Kliś-*,A Kowalski-T Garbacik | 17 | NS | 3 | W | A | = | -140 | 33.82% | 56.89% | |||
M Kliś-A Kowalski,T Garbacik-* | 18 | WE | 3× | E | A | -2 | -300 | 2.94% | 54.32% | |||
8 | M Bublewicz-G Superson,*-W Dygas | 22 | WE | 4 | W | K | -1 | -100 | 73.53% | 55.19% | ||
M Bublewicz-*,W Dygas-G Superson | 23 | NS | 1 | S | 6 | -1 | -100 | 67.65% | 55.74% | |||
M Bublewicz-W Dygas,G Superson-* | 24 | WE | 2 | N | 9 | = | -110 | 26.47% | 54.52% | |||
9 | P Kazub-I Jagielski,*-Z Pinkiewicz | 28 | WE | 3 | N | 3 | +1 | -630 | 32.35% | 53.63% | ||
P Kazub-*,Z Pinkiewicz-I Jagielski | 29 | NS | 3 | E | 5 | -2 | +200 | 95.59% | 55.24% | |||
P Kazub-Z Pinkiewicz,I Jagielski-* | 30 | WE | 2 | N | 4 | -2 | +100 | 41.18% | 54.72% | |||
10 | J Grewling-R Jarmużewski,*-T Kaczanowski | 19 | WE | 3 | E | J | +3 | +690 | 83.82% | 55.76% | ||
J Grewling-*,T Kaczanowski-R Jarmużewski | 20 | NS | 4 | W | 3 | +1 | -650 | 89.71% | 56.93% | |||
J Grewling-T Kaczanowski,R Jarmużewski-* | 21 | WE | 1 | E | 4 | -1 | -50 | 72.06% | 57.44% | |||
SUMA: | 57.44% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 57.44% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 16 |
Pary.4.1.0.25 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2018-08-07 o 14:19:12