Kongresowy Turniej Indywidualny 135: J Wiśniewska | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | J Rozenberg-S Wiśniewski,*-W Starkowski | 13 | WE | 3 | W | 10 | +1 | +170 | 57.35% | 57.35% | ||
J Rozenberg-*,W Starkowski-S Wiśniewski | 14 | NS | 3 | N | J | = | +110 | 92.65% | 75.00% | |||
J Rozenberg-W Starkowski,S Wiśniewski-* | 15 | WE | 1 | S | 3 | = | -90 | 34.87% | 61.62% | |||
2 | M Pietrzak-P Ciszak,*-A Pawlak | 4 | WE | 2 | N | 6 | = | -110 | 66.18% | 62.76% | ||
M Pietrzak-*,A Pawlak-P Ciszak | 5 | NS | 4 | E | 4 | +1 | -450 | 32.35% | 56.68% | |||
M Pietrzak-A Pawlak,P Ciszak-* | 6 | WE | 3 | S | Q | = | -400 | 27.94% | 51.89% | |||
3 | M Jaworski-L Łuniewski,*-A Osiński | 10 | WE | 4 | W | 8 | +2 | +680 | 10.29% | 45.95% | ||
M Jaworski-*,A Osiński-L Łuniewski | 11 | NS | 1 | S | 10 | -1 | -50 | 16.18% | 42.23% | |||
M Jaworski-A Osiński,L Łuniewski-* | 12 | WE | 4 | S | 10 | +1 | -650 | 57.35% | 43.91% | |||
4 | M Boczar-M Bednarczyk,*-P Szczygieł | 1 | WE | 1 | S | K | -1 | +50 | 10.29% | 40.55% | ||
M Boczar-*,P Szczygieł-M Bednarczyk | 2 | NS | 4 | E | 7 | = | -420 | 45.59% | 41.00% | |||
M Boczar-P Szczygieł,M Bednarczyk-* | 3 | WE | 3 | N | K | -1 | +50 | 4.41% | 37.95% | |||
5 | K Dowolski-Y Hardzei,*-M Witek | 7 | WE | 4 | S | K | -1 | +100 | 61.76% | 39.79% | ||
K Dowolski-*,M Witek-Y Hardzei | 8 | NS | 4 | N | 2 | -3 | -150 | 82.35% | 42.83% | |||
K Dowolski-M Witek,Y Hardzei-* | 9 | WE | 3 | E | 5 | = | +600 | 70.59% | 44.68% | |||
6 | M Kliś-R Jarmużewski,*-W Dygas | 28 | WE | 3 | N | A | +1 | -630 | 32.35% | 43.91% | ||
M Kliś-*,W Dygas-R Jarmużewski | 29 | NS | 3 | W | A | +2 | -200 | 54.41% | 44.53% | |||
M Kliś-W Dygas,R Jarmużewski-* | 30 | WE | 3 | N | Q | -3 | +150 | 94.12% | 47.28% | |||
7 | M Bublewicz-K Sikorski,*-Z Pinkiewicz | 19 | WE | 4 | E | 2 | +1 | +650 | 26.47% | 46.18% | ||
M Bublewicz-*,Z Pinkiewicz-K Sikorski | 20 | NS | 4 | W | K | +2 | -680 | 48.53% | 46.30% | |||
M Bublewicz-Z Pinkiewicz,K Sikorski-* | 21 | WE | 3 | E | 7 | -3 | -150 | 27.94% | 45.43% | |||
8 | P Kazub-T Garbacik,*-T Kaczanowski | 25 | WE | 4 | E | K | = | +620 | 88.24% | 47.37% | ||
P Kazub-*,T Kaczanowski-T Garbacik | 26 | NS | 5 | S | 4 | +1 | +620 | 54.41% | 47.68% | |||
P Kazub-T Kaczanowski,T Garbacik-* | 27 | WE | 3 | S | 5 | +2 | -460 | 36.76% | 47.22% | |||
9 | J Grewling-G Superson,*-V Kanstantsinau | 16 | WE | 4 | E | 6 | +1 | +650 | 69.12% | 48.10% | ||
J Grewling-*,V Kanstantsinau-G Superson | 17 | NS | 2 | W | A | +1 | -140 | 33.82% | 47.55% | |||
J Grewling-V Kanstantsinau,G Superson-* | 18 | WE | 3 | E | K | = | +110 | 82.35% | 48.84% | |||
10 | A Kończak-I Jagielski,*-A Kowalski | 22 | WE | 2 | S | Q | = | -110 | 55.88% | 49.09% | ||
A Kończak-*,A Kowalski-I Jagielski | 23 | NS | 2 | E | A | = | -110 | 47.06% | 49.02% | |||
A Kończak-A Kowalski,I Jagielski-* | 24 | WE | 2 | N | 2 | -1 | +50 | 60.29% | 49.40% | |||
SUMA: | 49.40% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 49.40% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 77 |
Pary.4.1.0.25 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2018-08-07 o 14:19:12