diff options
author | xue <> | 2007-10-13 01:48:28 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | xue <> | 2007-10-13 01:48:28 +0000 |
commit | dbb73305b29a8cc3b160688e8977049af785ab32 (patch) | |
tree | 1d04885a8fbf159958809e203a8951a6ac453f43 /demos | |
parent | d92c791ab6be7a5ba9e776fe5ba6b08e7b9c4c9f (diff) |
Active Record now supports implicitly declared related properties
Diffstat (limited to 'demos')
-rw-r--r-- | demos/quickstart/protected/pages/Database/ActiveRecord.page | 61 |
1 files changed, 44 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/demos/quickstart/protected/pages/Database/ActiveRecord.page b/demos/quickstart/protected/pages/Database/ActiveRecord.page index cb10d184..d2793fa1 100644 --- a/demos/quickstart/protected/pages/Database/ActiveRecord.page +++ b/demos/quickstart/protected/pages/Database/ActiveRecord.page @@ -624,7 +624,7 @@ class TeamRecord extends TActiveRecord public $name; public $location; - public $players=array(); + public $players=array(); // this declaration is no longer needed since v3.1.2 //define the $player member having has many relationship with PlayerRecord public static $RELATIONS=array @@ -650,6 +650,16 @@ The second element is a string <tt>'PlayerRecord'</tt> that corresponds to the class name of the <tt>PlayerRecord</tt> class. </p> +<div class="note"><b class="note">Note:</b> +As described in the code comment above, since version <b>3.1.2</b>, related properties no longer +need to be explicitly declared. By default, they will be implicitly declared according to +keys of the <tt>$RELATIONS</tt> array. A major benefit of declared related properties implicitly +is that related objects can be automatically loaded in a lazy way. For example, assume we have +a <tt>TeamRecord</tt> instance <tt>$team</tt>. We can access the players via <tt>$team->players</tt>, +even if we have never issued fetch command for players. If <tt>$players</tt> is explicitly declared, +we will have to use the <tt>with</tt> approach described in the following to fetch the player records. +</div> + <p id="710022" class="block-content"> The foreign key constraint of the <tt>Players</tt> table is used to determine the corresponding <tt>Teams</tt> table's corresponding key names. This is done automatically handled @@ -657,9 +667,9 @@ in Active Record by inspecting the <tt>Players</tt> and <tt>Teams</tt> table def </p> <div class="info"><b class="note">Info:</b> -Since version <b>3.1.2</b>, Active Record supports multiple foreign key +Since version <b>3.1.2</b>, Active Record supports multiple foreign key references of the same table. Ambiguity between multiple foreign key references to the same table is -resolved by providing the foreign key column name as the 3rd parameter in the relationship array. +resolved by providing the foreign key column name as the 3rd parameter in the relationship array. For example, both the following foreign keys <tt>owner_id</tt> and <tt>reporter_id</tt> references the same table defined in <tt>UserRecord</tt>. <com:TTextHighlighter Language="php" CssClass="source block-content"> @@ -668,8 +678,8 @@ class TicketRecord extends TActiveRecord public $owner_id; public $reporter_id; - public $owner; - public $reporter; + public $owner; // this declaration is no longer needed since v3.1.2 + public $reporter; // this declaration is no longer needed since v3.1.2 public static $RELATION=array ( @@ -679,7 +689,7 @@ class TicketRecord extends TActiveRecord } </com:TTextHighlighter> This is applicable to relationships including <tt>BELONGS_TO</tt>, <tt>HAS_ONE</tt> and -<tt>HAS_MANY</tt>. See section <a href="#142021">Self Referenced Association Tables</a> for solving ambiguity of <tt>MANY_TO_MANY</tt> +<tt>HAS_MANY</tt>. See section <a href="#142021">Self Referenced Association Tables</a> for solving ambiguity of <tt>MANY_TO_MANY</tt> relationships. </div> @@ -709,6 +719,16 @@ and other join conditions are not feasible using Active Records. For queries out scope of Active Record the <a href="?page=Database.SqlMap">SqlMap Data Mapper</a> may be considered. </div> +<div class="info"><b class="info">Info:</b> +The above <tt>with</tt> approach also works with implicitly declared related properties (introduced +in version 3.1.2). So what is the difference between the <tt>with</tt> approach and the lazy loading +approach? Lazy loading means we issue an SQL query if a related object is initially accessed and not ready, +while the <tt>with</tt> approach queries for the related objects once for all, no matter the related objects +are accessed or not. The lazy loading approach is very convenient since we do not need to explictly +load the related objects, while the <tt>with</tt> approach is more efficient if multiple records are +returned, each with some related objects. +</div> + <h3 id="142018">Belongs To Relationship</h3> <p id="710025" class="block-content">The "has many" relationship in the above section defines a collection of foreign objects. In particular, we have that a <tt>TeamRecord</tt> has many (zero or more) @@ -726,9 +746,9 @@ class PlayerRecord extends TActiveRecord public $age; public $team_name; - public $team; - public $skills=array(); - public $profile; + public $team; // this declaration is no longer needed since v3.1.2 + public $skills=array(); // this declaration is no longer needed since v3.1.2 + public $profile; // this declaration is no longer needed since v3.1.2 public static $RELATIONS=array ( @@ -785,7 +805,7 @@ class ProfileRecord extends TActiveRecord public $player_id; public $salary; - public $player; + public $player; // this declaration is no longer needed since v3.1.2 public static $RELATIONS=array ( @@ -830,8 +850,8 @@ class Category extends TActiveRecord public $category_name; public $parent_cat_id; - public $parent_category; - public $child_categories=array(); + public $parent_category; // this declaration is no longer needed since v3.1.2 + public $child_categories=array(); // this declaration is no longer needed since v3.1.2 public static $RELATIONS=array ( @@ -870,7 +890,7 @@ in the <tt>Player_Skills</tt> association table using an inner join. </p> <p id="710035" class="block-content">The Prado Active Record design implements the two stage approach. For the -<tt>Players</tt>-<tt>Skills</tt> M-N (many-to-many) entity relationship, we +<tt>Players</tt>-<tt>Skills</tt> M-N (many-to-many) entity relationship, we define a <b>many-to-many</b> relationship in the <tt>PlayerRecord</tt> class and in addition we may define a <b>many-to-many</b> relationship in the <tt>SkillRecord</tt> class as well. The following sample code defines the complete <tt>SkillRecord</tt> class with a @@ -885,7 +905,7 @@ class SkillRecord extends TActiveRecord public $skill_id; public $name; - public $players=array(); + public $players=array(); // this declaration is no longer needed since v3.1.2 public static $RELATIONS=array ( @@ -910,10 +930,10 @@ of the association table name. </p> <div class="note"><b class="note">Note:</b> -Prior to version <b>3.1.2</b> (versions up to 3.1.1), the many-to-many relationship was +Prior to version <b>3.1.2</b> (versions up to 3.1.1), the many-to-many relationship was defined using <tt>self::HAS_MANY</tt>. For version <b>3.1.2</b> onwards, this must be changed to <tt>self::MANY_TO_MANY</tt>. This can be done by searching for the <tt>HAS_MANY</tt> in your -source code and carfully changing the appropriate definitions. +source code and carfully changing the appropriate definitions. </div> <p id="710037" class="block-content"> @@ -975,7 +995,7 @@ class Item extends TActiveRecord //additional foreign item id defined in the association table public $related_item_id; - public $related_items=array(); + public $related_items=array(); // this declaration is no longer needed since v3.1.2 public static $RELATIONS=array ( @@ -1030,6 +1050,13 @@ PlayerSkillAssocation::finder()->deleteByPk(array('fk1','fk2')); </com:TTextHighlighter> <h2 id="142015">Lazy Loading Related Objects</h2> + +<div class="note"><b class="note">Note:</b> +Implicitly declared related properties introduced in version 3.1.2 automatically have lazy +loading feature. Therefore, the lazy loading technique described in the following is no longer +needed in most of the cases, unless you want to manipulate the related objects through getter/setter. +</div> + <p id="710045" class="block-content">Using the <tt>with_xxx()</tt> methods will load the relationship record on demand. Retrieving the related record using lazy loading (that is, only when those related objects are accessed) can be achieved by using a feature of the <tt>TComponent</tt> that provides accessor methods. In particular, |