1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
|
<html>
<head>
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<title>
Extending the SimpleTest unit tester with additional expectation classes
</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="docs.css" title="Styles">
</head>
<body>
<div class="menu_back">
<div class="menu">
<h2>
<a href="index.html">SimpleTest</a>
</h2>
<ul>
<li>
<a href="overview.html">Overview</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="unit_test_documentation.html">Unit tester</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="group_test_documentation.html">Group tests</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="server_stubs_documentation.html">Server stubs</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="mock_objects_documentation.html">Mock objects</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="partial_mocks_documentation.html">Partial mocks</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="reporter_documentation.html">Reporting</a>
</li>
<li>
<span class="chosen">Expectations</span>
</li>
<li>
<a href="web_tester_documentation.html">Web tester</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="form_testing_documentation.html">Testing forms</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="authentication_documentation.html">Authentication</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="browser_documentation.html">Scriptable browser</a>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<h1>Expectation documentation</h1>
<div class="content">
<p>
<a class="target" name="mock">
<h2>More control over mock objects</h2>
</a>
</p>
<p>
The default behaviour of the
<a href="mock_objects_documentation.html">mock objects</a>
in
<a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/simpletest/">SimpleTest</a>
is either an identical match on the argument or to allow any argument at all.
For almost all tests this is sufficient.
Sometimes, though, you want to weaken a test case.
</p>
<p>
One place where a test can be too tightly coupled is with
text matching.
Suppose we have a component that outputs a helpful error
message when something goes wrong.
You want to test that the correct error was sent, but the actual
text may be rather long.
If you test for the text exactly, then every time the exact wording
of the message changes, you will have to go back and edit the test suite.
</p>
<p>
For example, suppose we have a news service that has failed
to connect to its remote source.
<pre>
<strong>class NewsService {
...
function publish(&$writer) {
if (! $this->isConnected()) {
$writer->write('Cannot connect to news service "' .
$this->_name . '" at this time. ' .
'Please try again later.');
}
...
}
}</strong>
</pre>
Here it is sending its content to a
<span class="new_code">Writer</span> class.
We could test this behaviour with a
<span class="new_code">MockWriter</span> like so...
<pre>
class TestOfNewsService extends UnitTestCase {
...
function testConnectionFailure() {<strong>
$writer = &new MockWriter($this);
$writer->expectOnce('write', array(
'Cannot connect to news service ' .
'"BBC News" at this time. ' .
'Please try again later.'));
$service = &new NewsService('BBC News');
$service->publish($writer);
$writer->tally();</strong>
}
}
</pre>
This is a good example of a brittle test.
If we decide to add additional instructions, such as
suggesting an alternative news source, we will break
our tests even though no underlying functionality
has been altered.
</p>
<p>
To get around this, we would like to do a regular expression
test rather than an exact match.
We can actually do this with...
<pre>
class TestOfNewsService extends UnitTestCase {
...
function testConnectionFailure() {
$writer = &new MockWriter($this);<strong>
$writer->expectOnce(
'write',
array(new WantedPatternExpectation('/cannot connect/i')));</strong>
$service = &new NewsService('BBC News');
$service->publish($writer);
$writer->tally();
}
}
</pre>
Instead of passing in the expected parameter to the
<span class="new_code">MockWriter</span> we pass an
expectation class called
<span class="new_code">WantedPatternExpectation</span>.
The mock object is smart enough to recognise this as special
and to treat it differently.
Rather than simply comparing the incoming argument to this
object, it uses the expectation object itself to
perform the test.
</p>
<p>
The <span class="new_code">WantedPatternExpectation</span> takes
the regular expression to match in its constructor.
Whenever a comparison is made by the <span class="new_code">MockWriter</span>
against this expectation class, it will do a
<span class="new_code">preg_match()</span> with this pattern.
With our test case above, as long as "cannot connect"
appears in the text of the string, the mock will issue a pass
to the unit tester.
The rest of the text does not matter.
</p>
<p>
The possible expectation classes are...
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="new_code">EqualExpectation</span></td><td>An equality, rather than the stronger identity comparison</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span class="new_code">NotEqualExpectation</span></td><td>An inequality comparison</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span class="new_code">IndenticalExpectation</span></td><td>The default mock object check which must match exactly</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span class="new_code">NotIndenticalExpectation</span></td><td>Inverts the mock object logic</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span class="new_code">WantedPatternExpectation</span></td><td>Uses a Perl Regex to match a string</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span class="new_code">NoUnwantedPatternExpectation</span></td><td>Passes only if failing a Perl Regex</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span class="new_code">IsAExpectation</span></td><td>Checks the type or class name only</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span class="new_code">NotAExpectation</span></td><td>Opposite of the <span class="new_code">IsAExpectation</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span class="new_code">MethodExistsExpectation</span></td><td>Checks a method is available on an object</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Most take the expected value in the constructor.
The exceptions are the pattern matchers, which take a regular expression,
and the <span class="new_code">IsAExpectation</span> and <span class="new_code">NotAExpectation</span> which takes a type
or class name as a string.
</p>
<p>
<a class="target" name="behaviour">
<h2>Using expectations to control stubs</h2>
</a>
</p>
<p>
The expectation classes can be used not just for sending assertions
from mock objects, but also for selecting behaviour for either
the
<a href="mock_objects_documentation.html">mock objects</a>
or the
<a href="server_stubs_documentation.html">server stubs</a>.
Anywhere a list of arguments is given, a list of expectation objects
can be inserted instead.
</p>
<p>
Suppose we want an authorisation server stub to simulate a successful login
only if it receives a valid session object.
We can do this as follows...
<pre>
Stub::generate('Authorisation');
<strong>
$authorisation = new StubAuthorisation();
$authorisation->setReturnValue(
'isAllowed',
true,
array(new IsAExpectation('Session', 'Must be a session')));
$authorisation->setReturnValue('isAllowed', false);</strong>
</pre>
We have set the default stub behaviour to return false when
<span class="new_code">isAllowed</span> is called.
When we call the method with a single parameter that
is a <span class="new_code">Session</span> object, it will return true.
We have also added a second parameter as a message.
This will be displayed as part of the mock object
failure message if this expectation is the cause of
a failure.
</p>
<p>
This kind of sophistication is rarely useful, but is included for
completeness.
</p>
<p>
<a class="target" name="extending">
<h2>Creating your own expectations</h2>
</a>
</p>
<p>
The expectation classes have a very simple structure.
So simple that it is easy to create your own versions for
commonly used test logic.
</p>
<p>
As an example here is the creation of a class to test for
valid IP addresses.
In order to work correctly with the stubs and mocks the new
expectation class should extend
<span class="new_code">SimpleExpectation</span>...
<pre>
<strong>class ValidIp extends SimpleExpectation {
function test($ip) {
return (ip2long($ip) != -1);
}
function testMessage($ip) {
return "Address [$ip] should be a valid IP address";
}
}</strong>
</pre>
There are only two methods to implement.
The <span class="new_code">test()</span> method should
evaluate to true if the expectation is to pass, and
false otherwise.
The <span class="new_code">testMessage()</span> method
should simply return some helpful text explaining the test
that was carried out.
</p>
<p>
This class can now be used in place of the earlier expectation
classes.
</p>
<p>
<a class="target" name="unit">
<h2>Under the bonnet of the unit tester</h2>
</a>
</p>
<p>
The <a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/simpletest/">SimpleTest unit testing framework</a>
also uses the expectation classes internally for the
<a href="unit_test_documentation.html">UnitTestCase class</a>.
We can also take advantage of these mechanisms to reuse our
homebrew expectation classes within the test suites directly.
</p>
<p>
The most crude way of doing this is to use the
<span class="new_code">SimpleTest::assertExpectation()</span> method to
test against it directly...
<pre>
<strong>class TestOfNetworking extends UnitTestCase {
...
function testGetValidIp() {
$server = &new Server();
$this->assertExpectation(
new ValidIp(),
$server->getIp(),
'Server IP address->%s');
}
}</strong>
</pre>
This is a little untidy compared with our usual
<span class="new_code">assert...()</span> syntax.
</p>
<p>
For such a simple case we would normally create a
separate assertion method on our test case rather
than bother using the expectation class.
If we pretend that our expectation is a little more
complicated for a moment, so that we want to reuse it,
we get...
<pre>
class TestOfNetworking extends UnitTestCase {
...<strong>
function assertValidIp($ip, $message = '%s') {
$this->assertExpectation(new ValidIp(), $ip, $message);
}</strong>
function testGetValidIp() {
$server = &new Server();<strong>
$this->assertValidIp(
$server->getIp(),
'Server IP address->%s');</strong>
}
}
</pre>
It is unlikely we would ever need this degree of control
over the testing machinery.
It is rare to need the expectations for more than pattern
matching.
Also, complex expectation classes could make the tests
harder to read and debug.
These mechanisms are really of most use to authors of systems
that will extend the test framework to create their own tool set.
</p>
</div>
<div class="copyright">
Copyright<br>Marcus Baker, Jason Sweat, Perrick Penet 2004
</div>
</body>
</html>
|
